[DVBC] Okay to change default response?

[Dave Hartrum]

OH NO, we wouldn't want to get a little carried away.
That wouldn't be proper. 
By the way D'stre was your response really meant for the entire list-serve or should you have replied directly to Doug?
I would think the etiquette czar would know better.

----------------
Dave Hartrum
dhartrum at mac.com

 
On Monday, March 10, 2008, at 07:08AM, <dster at craftech.com> wrote:
>> OOH Doug,
>
>Now that is so tactful.  The issue here is not rules but a little bit of
>ettiquette.  Please respond directly to the sender for personal responses.
>A joke is welcome.  We don't need to stick to cycling.  Sometimes we get a
>little carried away.  Well put Doug.
>
>D'stre`
>
>
>
>Drew,
>>
>> I think the list is OK just the way it is.  After all it just makes good
>> fodder to see who can't use E-mail correctly.
>>
>> Life would be too boring if everything is goof proof, Buckeye
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dvbc-list-bounces at list.dvbc.org
>> [mailto:dvbc-list-bounces at list.dvbc.org] On Behalf Of Drew Knox
>> Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 10:38 AM
>> To: dvbc-list at dvbc.org
>> Subject: [DVBC] Okay to change default response?
>>
>> I suggest we change the default response on our club's list serve so
>> messages go back to the sender instead of the entire group. I think that
>> would cut down on the clutter since the list serve gets a lot of
>> personal responses to general messages. You can still respond to the
>> entire list by changing the To: address -- just the default would change
>> when you hit Reply.
>>
>> Any serious objections?
>>
>> Drew
>> _______________________________________________
>> DVBC mailing list
>> DVBC at list.dvbc.org
>> http://list.dvbc.org/mailman/listinfo/dvbc-list
>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>DVBC mailing list
>DVBC at list.dvbc.org
>http://list.dvbc.org/mailman/listinfo/dvbc-list
>
>